Small Business Human Resources Blog

If you're new here, you may want to subscribe to our RSS feed or get an email when there is a new post. Thanks for visiting!

Commissions should produce the right sales

Oct 15th, 2008 | By Ellen Kirton | Category: Compensation
 

Oftentimes, employers build compensation plans to incent their employees to sell their product or service to obtain better results. What they often omit is ensuring that there is a balance between new and retention, both of which we will discuss. If you have a variety of products/services, and offer an incentive for a designated dollar amount of , then your salesperson can sell any level of product as long as they get to or exceed that designated dollar amount.

It is a more profitable system to determine, in advance, what is your highest margined product/service and be sure that there is enough goal to ensure that the salesperson focuses the right amount of attention on that segment. An example would be:

Product A: 55% gross

Product B: 45% gross

Product C: 35% gross

If Product C is “easier” to sell and your salesperson only has to reach that dollar goal, they will naturally lean towards selling Product C. However, if they have to have a minimum dollar of Product A, they will be encouraged to sell more of this product in order to qualify for their commission.

Along with this, it is critical that retention be built in whenever possible. This could be accomplished by paying the salesperson a residual incentive for retaining clients they brought in. This could also be managed by profitability goals. This would show that the company’s net profitability for this salesperson’s portfolio is growing. It doesn’t benefit a company to have a “super” salesperson who doesn’t retain clients because are probably their major focus; and therefore the new only marginally cover lost business.

Net/net, the company loses money in this scenario because they are paying a salesperson when the net profitability doesn’t increase enough to even cover the commission. The average cost to replace an existing client with a new one is 3 times the cost of retaining one!

Finally, it’s okay and even advisable to have qualifiers in your plan. Your staff have to adhere to things like representing the company’s vision and mission. They have to be a team player, closing a sale generally involves working with others in the company. If you have someone that loves to go out and bring in the business but can’t work well with those that actually have to get the backshop part of the process done, the system breaks down. You may think of other qualifiers that will ensure that you have an all around star employee, internally and externally.

Commission can propel your company forward, hopefully this will help you hire the right people to ensure the overall success for them and for you.

  • Share/Save/Bookmark
Tags: , , , , ,

Similar Articles

Trackback URL: http://www.effortlesshr.com/blog/compensation/commissions-produce-sales/trackback/

Leave Comment

CommentLuv Enabled

This site uses KeywordLuv. Enter YourName@YourKeywords in the Name field to take advantage.

Comments

  1. You make some great points in your post Ellen – it is critical that an organization’s commission plans not only provide motiviation for sales people to make sales, but to make the rights sales that will best benefit their organization’s bottom line.

    I chose your post for inclusion in my weekly Rainmaker ‘Fab Five’ blog picks of the week which can be found here: http://www.maximizepossibility.com/employee_retention/2008/10/the-rainmaker-2.html

    Be well Ellen!

    Chris Young

  2. Interesting post Ellen. Depending on the type and size of organisation it may be worth splitting your salesforce into “hunters” (for new business) and “farmers” (for existing accounts). The hunters are then incentivised only to win new business, at which stage the accounts are handled by the “farmers”. The “farmers” are incentivised to keep accounts on board, and grow their business over time.

Pings & Trackbacks